So here's the article:
Eric Green doesn't use Windows very much. A long-time Linux user and advocate since 1995, Windows software interests him about as much as, say, the price of pork bellies on the Chicago futures market. So why is the publisher of a much-spammed Windows software product trying to shut him down?
Welcome to
the wild and wacky story of the strangest bunch of spammer scammers on
the Internet: those wacky folks at Robin Hood Software whose
overpriced "Evidence Eliminator" software is spammed on every Internet
forum on a regular basis. This is a tale of spammers and spam, and an
unlikely spam fighter who has learned that spammers suck even worse
than most people think. And in the end, it's the story of how spam
fighters around the globe support each other when the spammers decide to go
after their critics and detractors. It all started back in June
2000. At the time, I was researching encryption algorithms for use in
a new software product. There was this product called 'Evidence
Eliminator', produced by a company named 'Robin Hood Software', being
hyped on the sci.crypt and alt.privacy newsgroups. Curious, I went to
the web site of the
publisher of the software. After being subjected to flash animation,
popups threatening me with jail if I didn't buy Evidence Eliminator,
and no way to contact the makers of the product other than a web form,
I decided: "These people aren't credible." And said
so. From my work account. Big mistake. I didn't realize I was
dealing with spammers. I thought they'd be interested in seeing what
an industry veteran thought. But there was no response to my message
on the sci.crypt newsgroup. As far as I was concerned, that was the
end of it. I went on with my life. But Andy Churchill, one of the
principals of Robin Hood Software, wasn't so eager to let go. Imagine
my surprise when, in early 2001, I ran a Google search for my name and
discovered that I was part of a vast
conspiracy by some strange New World Order collection of villains
to destroy the makers of "the best security product on the market"!
Naturally I wasn't happy. And as someone who isn't shy about
expressing his opinion, I expressed it, sending EMAIL to Robin Hood
Software demanding that they remove any mention of me from their
site. Andy Churchill of Robin Hood Software admits
to have received that EMAIL, but says, "we deleted it". There was
no response from Robin Hood Software. So I did what comes
naturally to any Linux geek: I put up a web page. Which Robin Hood
Software swiftly (and in violation of my copyright) duplicated on
their own web site, with "False." (no explanation) beside each of my
points as to why you shouldn't buy their software. And as time went by
and, thanks to the readers of my site, I accumulated more and more evidence about Robin
Hood Software's activities, including evidence that they were behind
the "push ICQ" spamming of their product (an EMAIL to their
affiliates urging them to do that kind of spamming), Robin Hood
Software's web site became yet more
lurid, even to the point of duplicating a copyrighted gag
photo (cropping out Agent Binks) on their own web site. These
people don't appear to be too stable -- definite candidates for the aluminum foil beanie
award. In early 2002 I purchased the domain name
'evidence-eliminator-sucks.com', and did a major overhaul of the web
site to try to organize the by-then large amount of information that
I'd accumulated about Robin Hood Software and its activities. By that
time it was clear that these weren't nice people. Deceptive
claims in their advertising, huge amounts of spam originating from
their affiliates, a browser
hijack virus that hijacks people's web browsers and redirects them
to the Evidence Eliminator home page, and their continued attempts to
disparage their critics and competitors on their aptly-named Dis-Information
page pretty much are a Major Clue. I also launched the "Evidence
Eliminator Sucks Conspiracy" -- both a statement on what I feels
is Robin Hood Software's paranoia in their rantings
about a "vast conspiracy" out to "get" them, and an attempt to get
other security-oriented sites to link back to the new domain so that
when people went to Google to look up Robin Hood Software, the
evidence-eliminator-sucks.com site would come up near the top. The
effort appears to have paid off. The evidence-eliminator-sucks.com
site is regularly 3rd or 4th from the top on Google's list of results
for the term "evidence eliminator". The crew at Robin Hood Software is
so concerned that they have put out a special
warning that greets everyone who surfs in from Google. And, on
July 17, 2003, at approximately 10:15am, I got a call from my upstream
service provider: They had received a letter on lawyer's letterhead,
demanding that this service provider quit publishing
the site. It didn't take long to establish what was going
on. In a meeting at the ISP's offices, the ISP's operations manager
viewed the evidence-eliminator-sucks.com
site, viewed the www.evidence-eliminator.com
site, and quickly realized that a) these were "not nice people", and
b) these people had no case. Unlike in the given example case of
Godfrey vs. Demon Internet LLC, the ISP wasn't publishing the
site. The site never touched any of the ISP's computers. All the ISP
was providing was the upstream for the DSL line, the site was
published on a computer on my own home network. On the other hand,
even though the threat was nonsense, just showing up in an English
court to get a lawsuit dismissed would cost thousands of dollars. What
to do? The eventual decision was to take the site down, replace it
with the legal notice, and start spreading the word. I started
contacting the various members of the "conspiracy" (anybody who had
ever linked to the site), looking for people who could host mirrors of
the site so that it couldn't be shut down again via a single lawyer
nastygram. Word quickly spread in the news.admin.net-abuse hierarchy,
and numerous people stepped forward to host a mirror. I also made
copies of the site to two free webhosting companies and posted links
in various newsgroups. Finally, on July 19 2003, two days after the
takedown notice, the site was back up, hosted on several mirrors
scattered around the Internet. So what have I learned from this
experience? Well: But then, who ever said spammers were smart? - Eric
Lee Green, Phoenix, Arizona, July 20, 2003
What comes next? Well, I guess they sue
me. I'm not looking forward to it. This whole situation is a
distraction from my main chore right now -- looking for a new job (my employer laid
off their entire U.S. workforce a few weeks ago). On the other hand,
if they do so, you can bet I won't take it lying down. You mess with a
Cajun boy from Louisiana, you better expect more of the same coming
right back at you -- with interest. Considering that they've violated
my copyright thousands of times by distributing my copyrighted
photograph, somehow I think actually filing a lawsuit would be as
stupid as anything else this particular bunch of spammer scammers has
done.